Working group Pole Proofs, programs and systems Thematic team Proofs and programs Manage talks Syntax Meets Semantics Day, hour and place Thursday at 2pm, room 1007 The calendar of events (iCal format). In order to add the event calendar to your favorite agenda, subscribe to the calendar by using this link. Contact(s) Delia Kesner Subscribe to the list gdt-sms@listes.irif.fr to receive announcements concerning this working work. Next talks Syntax Meets Semantics Thursday June 22, 2023, 2PM, salle 146 (Olympe de Gouges) Miguel Ramos (Univ. Porto) Quantitative CBV Global Memory Syntax Meets Semantics Thursday September 7, 2023, 2PM, salle 146 (OdG) Mariana Milicich (Université Paris Cité, CNRS, IRIF) Useful Evaluation, Inductively and Quantitatively Previous talks Year 2023 Syntax Meets Semantics Thursday June 1, 2023, 2PM, salle 146 (Olympe de Gouges) Gabriele Vanoni (Univ. Bologna) Higher-Order and Non-Linear Bayesian Networks Syntax Meets Semantics Wednesday May 24, 2023, 2PM, salle 147 (Olympe de Gouges) Jose Espirito Santo (Univ. Minho (Portugal)) The logical essence of compiling with continuations Syntax Meets Semantics Thursday April 20, 2023, 1:30PM, salle 147 (Olympe de Gouges) Hugo Herbelin (IRIF, INRIA, Univ. Paris Cite) Under syntax and semantics, the logic Syntax Meets Semantics Thursday March 30, 2023, 1:30PM, salle 4052 Nino Salibra (Universita' Ca'Foscari Venezia) A completeness theorem for the infinitary lambda calculus Syntax Meets Semantics Tuesday March 28, 2023, 1:30PM, salle 3052 Fabio Massaioli (Scuola Normale Di Pisa) (Scuola Normale di Pisa) A non-trivial proof-semantics for classical sequent calculus (LK) Cut-reduction procedures for classical sequent calculus are notoriously non-deterministic and non-confluent, both in the original formulation by Gentzen and in later reformulations. It is natural to ask whether those instances of non-confluence are superficial in nature, i.e. whether syntactically distinct normal forms of the same derivation are in fact correlated in a non-trivial way, as is the case in the intuitionistic and linear versions of sequent calculus. A famous counter-example by Lafont purports to show that the answer is negative, that is, every interpretation of derivations in LK that is invariant under classical cut-elimination must be a trivial one that identifies at least all proofs of the same sequent. A long-standing open question has then been whether it could be possible to work around Lafont's example by natural and non-trivial adjustments of the calculus and/or of cut-reduction steps, without resorting to symmetry-breaking techniques like polarization or embeddings into intuitionistic or linear logic. Working within the propositional fragment of the context-sharing formulation of LK — where parallel logical rules permute freely — we show that the graph constructed by tracing the history of atomic formula occurrences through axiom and cut rules is invariant under arbitrary rule permutations in cut-free proofs, thus providing a canonical representation of normal-form proofs. We then introduce a refinement of the notion of axiom-induced graph that allows extending the invariance result to proofs with cuts, although at the cost of a strong assumption on the shape of derivations. Because cut-reduction in this formulation of LK can be implemented entirely by logical rule permutations plus a pair of local rewriting steps that preserve the refined axiom graphs, the result yields a non-trivial invariant of cut-reduction. Syntax Meets Semantics Thursday March 9, 2023, 2PM, salle 1007 Daniele Pautasso (Univ. Torino) A quantitative version of simple types Our work introduces a quantitative version of the simple type assignment system, starting from a suitable restriction of non-idempotent intersection types. The key idea is to restrict multiset formation to uniform types, two types being uniform if they differ only in the cardinality of the multisets occurring in it. The resulting system has the same typability power as the simple type assignment system; thus, assigning types to terms supplies the very same qualitative information given by simple types, but at the same time provides some interesting quantitative information. It is well known that typability for simple types is equivalent to unification; we prove a similar result for the newly introduced system. More precisely, we show that typability is equivalent to a unification problem which is a non-trivial extension of the classical one: in addition to unification rules, our typing algorithm makes use of an operation that increases the cardinality of multisets whenever needed. Syntax Meets Semantics Thursday March 2, 2023, 2PM, salle 1007 Riccardo Treglia Intersecting effects: two orthogonal approaches Syntax Meets Semantics Thursday February 9, 2023, 2PM, salle 1007 Giovanni Bernardi Breaking circles Syntax Meets Semantics Thursday January 26, 2023, 2PM, salle 1007 Sandra Alves Quantitative Weak Linearisation Syntax Meets Semantics Thursday January 12, 2023, 2PM, salle 1007 Les Doctorants Du Groupe De Travail (Universite Paris Cite) Présentation des doctorants du groupe et de leur thématique de recherche Year 2022 Syntax Meets Semantics Thursday December 15, 2022, 2PM, salle 1007 Victor Arrial Quantitative Inhabitation for Different Lambda Calculi in a Unifying Framework Syntax Meets Semantics Thursday November 3, 2022, 2PM, salle 1007 Loic Peyrot Repetition soutenance de these Syntax Meets Semantics Friday October 28, 2022, 2PM, salle 1007 Pablo Barenbaum Proof Terms for Higher-Order Rewriting and Their Equivalence Syntax Meets Semantics Wednesday October 19, 2022, 2PM, salle 1007 Adrienne Lancelot Open Call-by-Value and Open Similarity